PROOF THAT THE REAL BRENT SPINER COMMUNICATES WITH GAIL
The story in Brent Spiner’s CD Dreamland parallels the true story in Gail’s book The Forbidden Abyss: Part One. Gail’s movie Brent Spiner’s Rape reveals the identity of the “strange woman” (Loree McBride) who ended up in Brent’s bed in Brent’s CD Dreamland.
While Gail listened again (in October 2013) to a CD the real Brent Spiner made in 2007, called Dreamland, she realized to her delight, that she now had proof (in the form of VERY STRONG CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE) that the real Brent Spiner has been in her life since 1990.
When Gail wrote her book The Forbidden Abyss: Part One, she researched primarily from:
1) Her copy (2011 to 2013) of her online correspondence with Brent Spiner, Vladimir Putin, Matthew McConaughey, Hugh Jackman, judge Terrance Jenkins, Jesus Christ, and Gerard Butler.
2) Her memoir, which she started around 2005. It was at first called Catherine of King David (mostly written in 2005 and 2006).
3) Her memories from 1990 to now.
4) Judge Terrance Jenkins YouTube channel’s recording of the Quebec August 2011 trial (a showdown between Gail Chord Schuler and Jesuit Loree McBride).
Through these four sources, The Forbidden Abyss: Part One, came into being. Gail never even thought about using the Dreamland storyline for her book. That’s because she wanted her book to be factual and Brent used a lot of imagination for the story he wrote for Dreamland, which is a story based on his relationship with Gail. HOWEVER, Gail then realized that even though the Dreamland story was in many ways imagination, there were some uncanny coincidental similarities between the Dreamland story and her true story about her relationship with Brent in her novel The Forbidden Abyss: Part One. In fact, the similarities between the story in Dreamland and the story in her non-fiction novel The Forbidden Abyss: Part One are so many, that Gail has decided to just go all out and state that the two stories are one and the same! THIS IS PROOF THAT GAIL HAS THE REAL BRENT SPINER IN HER LIFE.
Brent told his story in the only way he could in 2007 through Dreamland. In 2007, Brent and Gail were very strong brain to brain lovers. In fact, Gail had just reinstated Brent Spiner as her primary lover in February 2006. About a year later (2007), with Gail and Brent still going strong brain to brain, Brent decided to make Dreamland to honor Gail.
Gail asked Brent why he mentioned Loree and her son on the Dreamland cover and in several interviews about the album. He said Loree threatened to kill Gail if Brent would not mention her name somewhere on the album, so he mentions her in VERY SMALL PRINT inside the cover with her son. Loree also forced him to mention her in public as he promoted his album. It’s obvious that he did so VERY RELUCTANTLY. Brent has always been worried that the Jesuits will kill Gail, which may explain why both Gail and Brent’s writings often deal with death themes. Their writings reflect the fact that Jesuits are obsessed with killing both Brent and Gail.
Dreamland was released about 2008. Gail did not have the Internet in 2008, so she did not know about Dreamland until she got the internet in 2010. Gail ordered Dreamland in 2010.
Brent kept some brain to brain secrets from Gail from 2006 (when Gail reinstated him as her primary brain to brain lover) to 2010 (when she got the Internet). He did not let her know that Loree McBride claimed that she had Brent’s son in 2002, nor did Gail know that Brent had made another music album for her until 2010. The last Gail knew about Loree McBride was that she supposedly killed herself in July 2001 (when Loree McBride actually blew up one of her clones inside of a car with a bomb). Loree did this to intimidate Brent, because in 2001, Brent was trying to marry Gail. The Jesuits played on Gail’s ignorance that Loree was actually still alive (Loree has hundreds of clones), and impregnated one of Loree’s many clones with Brent’s stolen semen from her 1992 rape of him.
The daily brain to brain communications between Gail and Brent (2006 to 2008) centered around lovemaking, and dealing with day to day Jesuit problems in Gail’s life. Gail knew that Loree McBride obtained her relationship with Brent through some sort of drug rape, as evidenced by the short story she wrote for Brent in 2000 called “Emerald Towers”, which she submitted to the Writer’s Digest Short Story Writing Competition in May 2000. More than likely, Writer’s Digest did not receive what she wrote, but probably received a Jesuit-doctored and inferior counterfeit version of “Emerald Towers”. Nevertheless, “Emerald Towers” reveals that Gail was aware that Loree obtained her relationship with Brent through some type of extortion and rape. Gail has always believed since December 1999, when Jesus told her that Loree was a Vatican agent, that Loree used some sort of drug rape on Brent. Gail hinted at this “drug rape” in her 2000 short story “Emerald Towers”. She did not want to go all out and call it a drug rape in 2000, because she feared Writer’s Digest may not publish her story. But the story strongly hints that Loree McBride drug raped Brent Spiner, which is what Gail believed in 2000.
Zack Knight’s lies at his website www.crazygail.com that Gail got the idea of a drug rape through Brent’s album Dreamland is absurd, and reveals to what extent Zack Knight will lie to try to discredit the evidence in Brent’s Dreamland that Gail and Brent thought of the same story for their works. Gail thought of it first in 2000 with her “Emerald Towers”, and the REAL Brent “agreed with her” through his storyline in Dreamland.
What Gail wrote in 2000 in Emerald Towers and what Brent wrote in 2007 in Dreamland are one and the same. THIS IS PROOF THAT GAIL HAS THE REAL BRENT IN HER LIFE.
Loree McBride is married to the Jesuit clone of the real Brent Spiner, who had the audacity to make a video in August 2012 contradicting what the real Brent Spiner wrote about Gail in Dreamland. This video of the Brent Spiner clone claiming he never knew Gail is going rabid on the Jesuit-controlled Internet, despite the fact that the real Brent took the clone to court for this and had him executed. Zack Knight, powerful computer genius, has cloned the entire Internet and replaced it with a Jesuit version, which makes it appear that Loree is the wife of the real Brent. Sadly, Jesuits have created other clones of Brent since then. Loree clones have also been executed since Loree lost her case to Gail in 2011 (Quebec trial). Another Loree clone lost her case to Gail again in 2012, as she attempted to stop Gail from publishing The Forbidden Abyss: Part One. But Jesuit clones are like cockroaches. They show up everywhere.
CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE POINTS STRONGLY TO THE FACT THAT AS CRAZY AS IT SEEMS, GAIL TELLS THE TRUTH. HER LIFE STORY (“Emerald Towers” and “The Forbidden Abyss: Part One) IS CONSISTENT WITH BRENT’S STORY IN DREAMLAND—PROOF THAT THE REAL BRENT EXISTS IN GAIL’S LIFE.
BRENT SPINER IN FEBRUARY 2008
ADMITS HE’S NOT MARRIED TO LOREE MCBRIDE
45 minutes and 28 seconds into +Brent Spiner’s 2008 Dave Rabbit radio interview, Brent nervously said this (about Loree McBride): “My ugh. . .girlfriend has this. . .ugh. . .I call her that 'cause we can never think of anything else to call each other, since we’re not married. We’ve been together --forever. Um. . .She. . .ugh. . .she really gets irritated with me, if I, if there’s even the hint of being surly when somebody comes up and says something nice to me-- or recognizes me. She really has no patience with me rolling my eyes or anything. She doesn’t get it. . .I like being an actor, but being a celebrity is a whole other thing. . You never get quite used to being treated as if you’re something special. . ..She really doesn’t have any patience for that, whatsoever, and she lectures me and says, ‘You should be really happy that people recognize you.’ ” And he's made willing and knowing love (from 1994 to ?) to a PUBLICIST? No legally valid public government records indicate Brent Spiner is married to Loree McBride, so why all these Jesuit websites that claim they are married? The real Brent Spiner (not his clone) does not feel he's married to Loree.
BRENT SPINER CLONE BOASTS ABOUT HIS FAME AND DEGRADES GAIL FOR NOT BEING FAMOUS—OBVIOUSLY NOT THE SAME BRENT AS IN THE FEBRUARY 2008 DAVE RABBIT RADIO INTERVIEW
Nathaniel asks the Brent clone at a Star Trek convention about Gail. “There’s this woman named Gail Chord Schuler, who’s become somewhat of an Internet meme by devoting this crazy YouTube channel to you. I’m wondering if you’ve ever heard of her.”
The Brent clone looks away with a snide expression on his face, which is the total opposite of the real Brent.
“And if you have a response to her claims and so forth,” Nathaniel asks.
The Brent clone answers, seemingly proud of the fact that he’s a celebrity and Gail is not. “Well, you know, nobody here knows what you are talking about, except for you, and um.” The clone has this look on his face as he says this, like he’s glad this question came up. Here is his chance to show how famous he is and how proud he is of that (STARK CONTRAST TO THE REAL BRENT IN ABOVE PARAGRAPH) and what a nobody Gail is. “So, I’d be glad to answer you privately about that. But I do know about it. It’s only been going on for about twenty-two years, and I’ve never met her or spoken to her.” The clone flails his hands about, as if enjoying this opportunity to mention Gail, the total opposite to the very private Brent (above). “She has a very rich fantasy life, and um—God bless her.” This clone has a personality that is vain, shallow, and seems to love the spotlight, poking fun at ‘Gail Chord Schuler’ for being a nobody, which is a stark contrast to the down to earth and humble and real Brent Spiner in the Brent Spiner 2008 Dave Rabbit radio interview above.
BRENT SPINER WARNS GAIL ABOUT HIS CLONE’S YOUTUBE VIDEO ABOUT GAIL IN AUGUST 2012:
I know that there are some people that think you are crazy, and you know I would never tell you to do anything you didn't want to do, but my advice to you would be to exercise your freedom of speech, and not be afraid to censor yourself online. Maybe you should lay low in public, and with doctors and employers (so as not to draw attention in the wrong places) but I don't think it should matter what you write about and express on a personal website, or even a video channel. That is your individual right, and it's nobody else's business, because everyone is entitled to their own opinions and beliefs. Furthermore, you have a lot of supporters and followers who don't think you are crazy at all, and they want to know the truth. The information you present online is a "take it or leave it" deal. People don't have to believe it, but if they sincerely examine the facts, they might just find out their perceptions have been misguided. Rather than being more vague on the subjects being doubted, maybe you should simply present more evidence and back up your claims with the facts and personal experiences. Nobody can fault you for that. You're like the Galileo of our times, my wife. You'll have "haters", but in the end, I feel that if you stick to what you really believe, you'll come out on top. Anyway, as your husband, that is just my advice. I will always support you no matter what you do.
(Brent’s email to Gail on August 29, 2012) Dear Gail,
Wow, that's insane!
I've never even been to Reddit. I just looked into this, and found out that the
Jesuits have just uploaded a video of my clone to their YouTube channel as well!
I suspect this has everything to do with the movie you are making. It's making us
look far too credible. As a precaution, I would be very careful about any strange
e-mails or messages you might receive during this time. I'm sure you know what to
do. I care for your safety.
I think it would be a wonderful idea to make a video about what happened in the 90's when Paramount Studios sent you that letter saying to never write me again. I think you should start back from the beginning with your son and the social worker you talked to, and how your ex later ignited the situation by writing a nasty letter to the studio. The story is an emotionally moving one, and to be honest, I don't think there's much more I can add, especially since our current state of affairs speaks for itself -- I'm still writing to you! It was Paramount Studios, not I, that sent you the letter. As you noticed, I didn't even sign my name. The studio acted on my behalf, without my permission, in an attempt to keep our love apart. You already know full well how deep they were willing to go when they allowed Loree McBride to enter the studio and repeatedly rape me.
It was indeed I, my darling, who made love to you with sweet longings over the phone, caressing you with my voice as your written words caressed my soul.